Which of these is not a valid Java access modifier?

Understanding Java Access Modifiers

Java's access modifiers control the visibility or accessibility of classes, interfaces, variables, and methods in Java. The access modifiers defined in Java are public, protected, and private, each providing a different level of access. Let's provide a brief description of each:

  • public: When a class, variable, or method is declared as public, it can be accessed from any other class in the Java program.

  • protected: The protected access modifier limits the visibility of a class, method, or variable such it can only be seen in it's own package or subclasses, even in other packages.

  • private: When a class, method or variable is declared private, it can only be accessed within the same class.

The quiz question mentioned a fourth "access modifier", namely friend. This is actually not a valid Java access modifier. The term friend is used in C++ programming language, not in Java. In C++, friend keyword is used to grant a non-member function or class the ability to access private or protected features of another class.

It's worth noting that the use of access modifiers forms an important practice in encapsulation, one of the fundamental principles of OOP (Object-Oriented Programming). Encapsulation is about bundling related data (attributes) and methods (behaviors) together into a single unit (Object), and controlling access to these data and methods. By properly setting access modifiers, we can ensure that sensitive data and methods are protected from unauthorized access and misuse.

In Java, it's consider a best practice to restrict the visibility of classes, interfaces, variables and methods to the lowest necessary. For instance, if a variable is only used in its own class, it should be declared private. This practice enhances security and maintainability of the code.

Do you find this helpful?